Showing posts with label Kuwait. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kuwait. Show all posts

Friday, 15 April 2022

The Three Lemons

 
A Pinzgauer Vector the highest priority of General Sir Richard Dannatt Commander in Chief Land Command on Salisbury Plain during the Vehicle Study Day on the 13th of September 2006
 
 
For centuries historians have struggled to explain the United Kingdom's frequent military defeats,but it was not until the advent of internet forums that the military illiteracy behind the deaths of hundreds of thousands of British soldiers became well documented,however,senior officers have long recorded their ignorance for posterity through the medium of defence procurement and herein we shall discuss several current projects.
 
An Ajax armoured fighting vehicle during cold weather system trials at Tame Ranges in Sweden between February and March 2019
 
 
An equivalent to and contemporary of the British Warrior Infantry Fighting Vehicle,A.S.CO.D. (Austrian Spanish COoperative Development) was developed by Austria and Spain,but despite needing a much larger number of vehicles,the British Army chose the improved A.S.CO.D. 2,rather than an all new design or a Warrior variant,as the basis of it's transformational Future Rapid Effects System which later became Ajax,an armoured reconnaissance vehicle which has neither the protection to withstand hits from weapons such as the 9M133M Kornet-M missile and 2A46 tank gun nor the fire power to suppress them,and which therefore must conduct reconnaissance by stealth,a task which requires neither medium armour nor a medium cannon,however,as Ajax currently does not work it may never enter service,which would be most fortunate.
 
A 99 Squadron Globemaster unloads new British Army Apache helicopters from Kansas City in the United States at Royal Air Force Brize Norton on the 24th of November 2020
 
 
Designed almost half a century ago,the Apache attack helicopter,as one of the few aircraft capable of delivering large numbers of precision weapons at night,had it's "happy time" attacking Iraqi forces during the liberation of Kuwait in Nineteen Ninety-one,a dozen years after that,during the invasion of Iraq,a force similar in size to the British Army's entire front line attack helicopter fleet was shot to pieces,in half an hour,by the poorly trained and equipped Medina Division over Karbala and in the Afghan war and Iraq wars combined more Apaches were lost than any other manned aircraft type,nevertheless,British Army officers decided that in an era of precision guided weapons a helicopter,with a large signature,which flies at slow speed and low altitude in close proximity to,and direct line of sight of,the enemy was the future of air warfare,before ordering another fifty,which may still be in service for the aircraft's eightieth birthday.
 
A Boxer Combat Reconnaissance Vehicle and an Abrams Main Battle Tank at Mount Bundey in the Northern Territory of Australia on the 15th of May 2017
 
 
The Boxer armoured truck,which shall already be a dozen years old by the time it enters British service,uniquely combines a modular hull which increases it's size,weight and cost for negligible benefit with a profile larger than a Main Battle Tank,ground pressure four times higher than an equivalent tracked vehicle,mechanicals which are exposed to enemy fire,a machine gun armed remote weapon station and protection against cannon fire both of which are inadequate in the front line and unnecessary anywhere else,and an ability to drive across Europe which,as the war in Ukraine has demonstrated,is utterly irrelevant.
 

Wednesday, 2 June 2010

F35C Versus F35B Combat Radii Applied To Historic Air Wars

The United Kingdom is currently committed to buying the F35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter for the Royal Air Force and Royal Naval Air Service.

This gives British forces four options for applying  air power in future wars:F35B from land bases;F35B from sea bases (aircraft carriers);F35C from land bases or F35C from sea bases.

We can examine the implications of these options by applying the combat radii of these aircraft types to base locations used in the seven major air wars in which the United Kingdom has participated in the 65 years since 1945.

In the following illustrations red flames indicate the area which is the main focus of combat operations.

A navy blue anchor indicates an aircraft carrier.

A light blue aeroplane indicates an air base on land.

A navy blue circle indicates the unrefueled combat radius of a sea based F35.

A red circle indicates the unrefueled combat radius of a land based F35.

Solid arrows indicate which radius is centred on each base.

Dashed arrows indicate the need for aerial refueling in order to reach the area which is the main focus of combat operations.

Click on each image to see it full size.


The Korean War 1950 to 1953.


The Suez Crisis 1956.


The Falklands War 1982.


The Guf War 1990 to 1991.


The Kosovo Conflict 1999.


The Invasion of Afghanistan 2001.


The Invasion of Iraq 2003.


The closer the operational area is to the centre of the tactical radius the better.

This permits aircraft to generate more sorties,spend more time on station or have more fuel margin for manoeuvre.

Thus allowing combat power to be delivered at a lower cost by a smaller number of combat aircraft.


Beyond the aircraft's tactical radius aerial refueling becomes essential.

Within the tactical radius the need for aerial refueling diminishes if the operational area is closer to the base area.

The cost of aerial refueling is substantial and money spent on tankers is money which cannot be spent on combat assets.


The vertical landing capability of the F35B gives it more basing options within the area of it's tactical radius.

However,the greater tactical radius of the F35C gives it a 60% greater area in which it may find basing options.


For the sea base,greater tactical radius increases the sea area in which the aircraft carrier may conceal itself.


It can be seen from these illustrations that the sea base,the aircraft carrier,is almost always closer to the operational area than the land base.

This permits significant financial savings by allowing substantial reductions in the number of combat aircraft and tanker aircraft required to generate a given level of combat power.


The longer combat radius of the F35C permits a further substantial reduction in the aerial refueling requirement.

This will more than pay for the additional cost of equipping aircraft carriers with catapults and arrestor wires.

The F35C is also said to be considerably cheaper than the F35B,one recent article claimed the F35C cost £15 Million less than the F35B which,if true,would equate to a saving of £945 Million on the 63 aircraft required to field a 36 strong carrier wing.


The F35B has advantages over the F35C in terms of being able to disperse away from airfields known to the enemy and being able to operate from a wider range of ships.

However these advantages come at a high cost both financially and operationally.

The F35B will cost more to buy and will require more expensive aerial refueling support.

In addition,it is less capable than the F35C in terms of range,payload and endurance.


There is an additional advantage which comes from using catapult equipped aircraft carriers as a sea base.

Helicopter based Airborne Early Warning (A.E.W.) aircraft are limited in terms of range,endurance,speed and altitude (and hence radar horizon).

They are incapable of supporting combat aircraft operating far from the sea base.

Consequently they must be supplemented by land based fixed wing A.E.W. aircraft.

These large aircraft operating far from their land bases have a substantial requirement for aerial refueling.

The cost of operating two A.E.W. fleets and providing the additional air tanker support for the land based aircraft is significant.

However,a carrier equipped with catapults would permit both of these fleets to be replaced with a smaller number of carrier capable fixed wing A.E.W. aircraft at a far lower cost.


In conclusion,the sea based F35C appears to be the most cost effective means for the United Kingdom to deliver air power.

Combined with fixed wing carrier capable A.E.W. aircraft,this option may offer cost savings of close to £2,000 Million a year combined with an enhanced ability to deploy air power globally.

These cost savings would derive from the following:

The ability to reduce the combat aircraft fleet from 330 aircraft at present to around 210 aircraft needed to maintain a front line strength of 124 aircraft with no loss of combat power due to the aircraft carrier's higher sortie generating capability.

The replacement of the Future Strategic Tanker Private Finance Initiative with a more economical outright purchase of 6 tanker aircraft with no lack of tanker capacity due to the much reduced aerial refueling demand.

The replacement of 7 Sentry and 13 Seaking A.E.W. aircraft with 10 E2D Hawkeye A.E.W. aircraft.