The latest rumour,which has not yet been officially denied,is that the recent crash of a Lightning II aircraft from Her Majesty's Ship Queen Elizabeth was caused by a rain cover which the pilot and aircraft maintainers had neglected to remove during pre-flight checks as they were too busy celebrating diversity (a term used to legitimise discrimination).
Showing posts with label Lightning II. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lightning II. Show all posts
Sunday, 28 November 2021
Friday, 19 November 2021
Carrier Strike Group 21: One Of Our Aircraft Is Missing
A pilot has been rescued and an aircraft salvage operation is underway after a Lightning II aircraft from Her Majesty's Ship Queen Elizabeth crashed in the Mediterranean Sea on the Seventeenth of November,TwentyTwenty-one,the Royal Navy has not yet confirmed rumours that a rainbow flag become entangled in the aircraft's lift fan when an attempt to create a hostile work environment for Muslim sailors went horribly wrong.
Due to it's complex vertical lift system,the F-35B variant of the Lightning II aircraft used by the United Kingdom is likely to have higher accident rates than the conventional variants and be more expensive to buy,more expensive to operate,generate lower sortie rates,carry lower payloads,have less range,have less endurance,be less maneuverable and require more aircraft and more aerial refuelling to do the same work.
There is a name for people who think such aircraft are a good idea,they are called Philip Hammonds.
Labels:
Her Majesty's Ship,
Lift Fan,
Lightning II,
Mediterranean,
Muslim,
Philip Hammond,
Queen Elizabeth,
Rainbow Flag,
Royal Navy,
Salvage
Thursday, 21 October 2010
Why Catapults Are Cheaper,By David Cameron
For a long time this blog has promoted the idea that the Royal Navy's new aircraft carriers should be fitted with catapults and arrestor wires.
This allows these ships to carry the cheaper and more capable F35C version of the Lightning II instead of the more expensive and less capable vertical landing F35B variant.
It also allows significant savings to be made in aerial refuelling aircraft and other support aircraft.
The most well known proponent of "stopping and then landing",Commander Sharkey Ward,also recently recommended that the "cat and trap" F35C be purchased instead of the less capable F35B.
Many people have argued against this idea.
They claimed that the F35C would cost more to operate than the F35C.
That argument has now been settled.
Yesterday in Parliament the British Prime Minister David Cameron made the following statement :
"We will build both carriers,but hold one in extended readiness.
We will fit the "cats and traps"-the catapults and arrester gear-to the operational carrier.
This will allow our allies to operate from our operational carrier, and it will allow us to buy the carrier version of the joint strike fighter, which is more capable, less expensive, has a longer range and carries more weapons.
We will also aim to bring the planes and the carriers in at the same time."
"We will build both carriers,but hold one in extended readiness.
We will fit the "cats and traps"-the catapults and arrester gear-to the operational carrier.
This will allow our allies to operate from our operational carrier, and it will allow us to buy the carrier version of the joint strike fighter, which is more capable, less expensive, has a longer range and carries more weapons.
We will also aim to bring the planes and the carriers in at the same time."
We agree wholeheartedly with the Prime Minister on this matter.
As there is some confusion surrounding the governments plans it is worth quoting the Prime Minister further:
"The Queen Elizabeth is not being "put back" in terms of its manufacture.
Once it has been manufactured, we will fit the "cats and traps"-the catapults and arrester gear-to the operational carrier,so that it can then work with the carrier version of the joint strike fighter, which is a better aircraft than the one that the last Government ordered.
"The Queen Elizabeth is not being "put back" in terms of its manufacture.
Once it has been manufactured, we will fit the "cats and traps"-the catapults and arrester gear-to the operational carrier,so that it can then work with the carrier version of the joint strike fighter, which is a better aircraft than the one that the last Government ordered.
That will make it fully interoperable with our closest allies, the Americans and the French.
So there is not a delay in the production of the carriers, as the hon. Gentleman says.
Some extra equipment needs to be added."
The Prime Minister continues:
"On the carriers, it will not delay their manufacture and production.
What it means is that as the first is produced, the most logical step would be to fit the "cat and trap" to that carrier,which will therefore come fully into service when the carrier version of the joint strike fighter arrives at the same time.
We will have solved one of the inherited problems of bringing the two things
together.
Clearly, an alternative would be to fit the "cat and trap" to the second carrier, but the most logical way ahead is the one that I have set out."
Her Majesty's Ship Queen Elizabeth then will not be delayed and will be fitted with catapults and arrestor wires.
Further detail can be found on Page 23 of the Strategic Defence and Security Review:
Further detail can be found on Page 23 of the Strategic Defence and Security Review:
"The strike needs to be made more capable.
Installing the catapult and arrestor will allow the UK to acquire the carrier-variant of Joint Strike Fighter ready to deploy on the converted carrier instead of the short take-off and vertical landing (STOVL) variant.
This version of the jet has a longer range and greater payload: this, not large numbers of aircraft, is the critical requirement for precision strike operations in the future.
The UK plans to operate a single model of JSF, instead of different land and naval variants.
Overall, the carrier-variant of the JSF will be cheaper, reducing through-life costs by around 25%."
That last line raises the question of why British forces ever wanted the vertical landing F35B in the first place.
Labels:
aircraft carrier,
Catapult,
Dave C,
David Cameron,
Lightning II,
Parliament,
Sharkey Ward
Thursday, 11 June 2009
Strategic Bombing,Operation Allied Force

During Operation Allied Force/Noble Anvil,the bombing of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (now Serbia and Montenegro) in 1999,American B2 Spirit strategic bombers flew from Whiteman Air Force Base,Missouri in the United States of America.

19 B2 bombers were based at Whiteman.
Of these,10 were being upgraded to Block 30 standard and 9 were available for operations.

Of the 9 operational aircraft,1 was used for training,1 was receiving it's final Block 30 upgrades and 1 was undergoing extensive maintenance,leaving 6 aircraft available for combat.

During the 78 day bombing campaign,these 6 aircraft flew 49 sorties,45 of which reached their targets and released ordnance.
A sortie typically lasted 28-32 hours,required 4 in flight refuellings and delivered 16 guided 2,000 pound bombs.

B2 Spirits flew less than 1% of the sorties in Operation Allied Force yet they dropped 11% of all bombs.

Furthermore,while other aircraft were often unable to drop bombs due to bad weather,the B2s flew above the clouds using radar and inertial/Global Positioning System (G.P.S.) guided bombs regardless of the weather conditions.
On a per sortie basis the B2's bombing performance was far better than most other aircraft used in this conflict.
It has been said that "The B–2 was the star of the air campaign over Kosovo".

The total purchase cost of 21 B2 Spirits was $44,754 Million.
See here: www.fas.org/man/gao/nsiad97181.htm
Just 6 of these were used in Operation Allied Force due to the upgrades already mentioned.
However,the difficulty in maintaining the low radar signature of these aircraft is such that they can require 124 hours of maintenance for each hour of flight.
Consequently they have mission capable rates as low as 26% and rarely more than 50%.
This means that typically only 5-10 aircraft are available for use at any one time anyway.
See here: www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/systems/b-2-ops.htm and here: www.fas.org/man/gao/nsiad97181.htm

It had then actually cost $7,459 Million to field each of the six Spirits used in Operation Allied Force.
Approximately 700 bombs were dropped by B2s during the 78 day campaign with a hit rate of around 87%.

That is a rate of 1.5 bombs dropped per aircraft per day or 1.3 bomb hits per aircraft per day at a cost of $7,459 Million per aircraft.
That does not include the cost,approximately $800 Million,of the four tankers required to get the strategic bombers to their targets in the first place.

The total capital cost of around $8,300 Million for the B2 bomber and it's supporting tankers is similar to the cost of a British Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carrier and it's airwing.

Yet the aircraft carrier,operating from the Adriatic Sea,could deliver at least 100 times as many bombs on target per day as the bomber and do so without any aerial refuelling support as all targets would be within the unrefuelled tactical radius of it's aircraft.
Whether the carrier is equipped with Super Hornets,Rafales,Typhoons or Lightning IIs (F35 B or F35 C),all targets in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia would lie within the unrefuelled tactical radius of it's aircraft when carrying 4 2,000 pound bombs.
No target being more than 300 miles from potential operating locations of the carrier.

If each of the 36 aircraft onboard such a carrier flew just one strike mission per day they would between them deliver 144 2,000 pound bombs in a day.
It is possible for a carrier to generate far more sorties than that.
British carrier aircraft were flying as many as 4 sorties per aircraft per day during the Falklands war in 1982.
The American aircraft carrier U.S.S Nimitz has demonstrated the ability to fly 200 strike sorties per day,4 sorties flown per fighter per day for 4 days,her captain thought she could have kept that rate up for a week.
The next generation American carrier U.S.S.Gerald R. Ford is designed to generate up to 5 strike sorties per aircraft per day.

Given the short distances involved,each sortie from a carrier in the Adriatic would take about one hour.
Under combat conditions carriers can turn aircraft around between sorties in under an hour,giving a total cycle time of about two hours per sortie over the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.
There is then the time for the carrier to generate as many as many as 5 sorties per aircraft in a single day while still leaving plenty of time for rest and maintenance.
Such a sortie rate would deliver 720 2,000 pound bombs in one day.
That is as many bombs delivered in a single day as the entire B2 bomber fleet dropped in 78 days of Operation Allied Force.
Which is rather impressive when one considers that the bombers and their tanker support cost 5 times as much as the carrier and it's air wing.
It is also 480 times as many bombs dropped per day as could be delivered by a single B2 Spirit and it's tankers at the same capital cost as the carrier and it's air wing.
In terms of bombs per day per dollar,even when one allows for the cost of the aircraft carrier's escort support ships and availability of ships and aircraft,the B2 Spirit still appears to offer exceedingly poor value for money.
Labels:
Allied Force,
B2,
Bombs,
carrier,
F35 C,
Falklands,
Gerald Ford,
H.M.S. Queen Elisabeth,
J.D.A.M,
Lightning II,
Nimitz,
Noble Anvil,
Rafale,
sorties,
Spirit,
Strategic Bombing,
Super Hornet.,
Typhoon
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




