Showing posts with label Scout. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Scout. Show all posts

Thursday, 10 June 2021

The Transformational Chinook Helicopter

 
A Chinook helicopter lowers an Iroquois helicopter to the ground probably in a field at the Fire Support Base Black Horse South Vietnam
 
 
Having first flown sixty years ago,long before anyone had thought to incorporate features such as crashworthiness and visual,acoustic,thermal and radio signature reduction in to helicopter designs,the Chinook has long been recognised as obsolescent by the United States' Army.
 
Karem Aircraft Joint Heavy Lift Concept
 
 
Over the years,there have been many attempts to develop a replacement for the Chinook,such as the Aerial Cargo Transport,Future Transport Rotorcraft,Air Maneuver Transport,Joint Heavy Lift and later Joint Future Theater Lift projects but,unfortunately,the United States' Army is about as good at developing military helicopters as the England football team is at World Cup penalty shootouts,having not successfully developed a new helicopter since the Apache,which first flew forty-six years ago,since then thousands of millions of United States' dollars have been wasted on a long series of failures such as the Comanche and Arapaho.
 
845 and 847 NAS are currently deployed onboard RFA Argus for Exercise Baltic Protector 2019
 
 
Over the same period,the United Kingdom's helicopter industry has successfully developed the Merlin and Wildcat helicopters,the latter being delivered both on time and on budget,a stark contrast to comparable American and European projects.
 
Portrait of James Heappey Member of Parliament for Wells
 
 
Nevertheless,the United States' Army's unimpressive record has clearly impressed Minister for the Armed Forces James Heappey,who in July of Twenty Twenty signed a Memorandum of Agreement intended "to share and understand each nation’s conceptual thinking for the development and application of Rotary Wing Capability",which is rather like asking Gerald Ratner to share tips on jewelry retailing,Mister Heappey concluded: "I could not be, nor have been, any clearer that this is absolutely not about the UK purchasing US kit.".
 
Future Vertical Lift
 
 
The United States' Army's plans to terminate Chinook production and instead invest in Future Vertical Lift,it's most recent ill conceived rotorcraft project,have run in to opposition from American politicians more interested in protecting eighteen thousand jobs in their constituencies than in equipping their army with modern helicopters.
 
USS Detroit LCS 7 traveling at more than 40 knots
 
 
As the Littoral Combat Ship project demonstrated,American politicians are happy to waste tens of thousands of millions of dollars on useless equipment as long as it benefits their electorate and campaign donors,British politicians are also keen to buy useless military equipment to protect jobs,as long as it is not British made equipment,or British jobs.
 
Portrait of Boris Johnson Member of Parliament for Uxbridge and South Ruislip
 
 
On the Nineteenth of November,Twenty Twenty the United Kingdom's Prime Minister,Boris Johnson,told Parliament: "Our plans will safeguard hundreds of thousands of jobs in the defence industry,protecting livelihoods across the UK and";"allow our new investment to be focused on the technologies that will revolutionise warfare";"to restore Britain’s position as the foremost naval power in Europe".
 
A Royal Air Force CH-47 Chinook helicopter arrives to extract troops at the end of an operation in Afghanistan
 
 
Six months later,his Secretary of State for Defence threatened thousands of jobs in the British helicopter industry by ordering more American built Chinook helicopters,the last of which shall be entering service seventy years after the Chinook first flew (and may still be in service after it's centenary) and none of which shall be suited to naval use.
 
1 Squadron Hawker Siddeley Harrier GR1s during Exercise Snowy Owl
 
 
The Chinook entered service with the Royal Air Force as an army support asset back in Nineteen Eighty,despite at one point being intended to provide logistical support for Royal Air Force Harriers,a concept which was as absurd as the Harrier it's self,as they were based behind friendly lines and could easily be supplied by truck.
 
The scene at Estancia House during its occupation by 3 Battalion Parachute Regiment 31 May to 11 June 1982
 
 
British forces first used the Chinook in combat during the Falklands War,being incapable of operating from most warships,four of them sailed south from Ascension Island in a disassembled state on the Steam Ship Atlantic Conveyor,three subsequently being lost when that ship was hit by Exocet missiles,leaving the task force crippled by it's dependence on a single Royal Air Force heavy lift helicopter and a large number of Royal Navy and British Army helicopters,such as the Scout,Wasp,Gazelle,Lynx,Wessex and Sea King,none of which could carry as much as a Chinook,but all of which could operate from warships.
 
Commando Helicopter Force 847 Naval Air Squadron Wildcat Battlefield Reconnaissance Helicopter
 
 
Four decades later,the Royal Navy and British Army now have new Wildcat helicopters which are well suited to operating from warships,but which have little useful payload,while the Royal Air Force is purchasing new Chinooks,which have adequate payload but which are inherently unsuited to naval use and incapable of operating from most British warships,thanks to which the British armed forces shall be lumbered with the same problem they had four decades ago for the next forty years.
 
Ministry of Defence Main Building from the air
 
 
The Ministry of Defence is clearly not a learning institution.
 
Portrait of Ben Wallace Member of Parliament for Wyre and Preston North
 
 
 

Tuesday, 21 June 2011

MQ8B Fire Scout Unmanned Helicopter Shot Down Over Libya


A North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (N.A.T.O.) unmanned helicopter appears to have been shot down in Libya*.




Film shown by C.N.N. appears to show the remains of an MQ8B Fire Scout helicopter,a type used by the United States' Navy.


As far as this blog is aware this may be the first unmanned helicopter to be shot down in combat.




If the loss was due to enemy action it is possible that it was the result of the unmanned helicopter having less situational awareness than a manned aircraft and if that is the case there are serious implications for the unmanned helicopter program.




*Thanks to Solomon at SNAFU for highlighting that.

Thursday, 20 January 2011

More British Defence Cuts Coming Soon?


Various media outlets have recently been reporting that the British Ministry Of Defence will have to make significant additional cuts in the near future.

These cuts will be on top of the significant reductions announced in the Strategic Defence and Security Review in October 2010.

The Financial Times reports that there is a shortfall of at least £1,000 Million a year in the defence budget.


It is difficult to know whether these reports are correct given the media's history of inaccuracy on defence matters.

However,if they are correct,there will need to be substantial cuts.


David Cameron personally took the decision to eliminate the United Kingdom's ability to independently conduct combat operations when he chose to cut the Harrier fleet and retain the Tornados.





"In terms of cost, if we remove the Tornado force, we would be looking at (saving) about £7.5 billion by 2018.
With the Harriers, we are looking at less than £1 billion."

That additional saving of £6,500 Million over the 7 years to 2018 equates to an average saving of £928 Million a year.
David Cameron's personal decision to retain the Tornado fleet appears to be the direct cause of the latest financial crisis at the Ministry Of Defence.


At least,if there is another financial crisis.
Reversing that decision is still possible.
Not only would that save a great deal of money but it would also restore the United Kingdom's ability to independently conduct war fighting operations.
Without that ability the British armed forces cannot serve the interests of the British taxpayer.
Making them little more than an expensive vanity project.

Another of the Strategic Defence and Security Review's strange omissions was the decision not to cut the obvious overcapacity in the Future Strategic Tanker Aircraft project.
These aircraft will cost a minimum of £441 Million a year over the contract's 27 year life from 2008 to 2035,over £497 Million for each of the 24 years the new tankers will be in service from 2011 to 2035 or £627 Million for each of the 19 years of full operating capability from 2016 to 2035.
It is difficult to see any need for more than half of the 14 A330 aircraft provided under this contract.
Had Future Strategic Tanker Aircraft been cut to an appropriate size in October hundreds of millions of pounds a year would have been saved.

Another obvious saving would be to cancel the badly thought out Future Rapid Effects System (F.R.E.S.),or what remains of it.
Not only would this save the British Army from being lumbered with an unsuitable vehicle for the next 50 years but it would also eliminate the damage to the economy caused by buying thousands of millions of pounds worth of foreign made ASCOD armoured vehicles.
A far cheaper option is upgrading the very similar and already in service Warrior vehicles (a direct equivalent of ASCOD).
The British Army could then get a more suitable,less economically damaging and more exportable,domestically designed and built modern armoured personnel carrier at a later date.
A type of vehicle which would be in high demand on the export market but which is not currently available anywhere.
The alternative is being stuck with a sexed up 1990s era infantry fighting vehicle with a flat bottom and hull penetrating torsion bar suspension until 2060.
A new armoured personnel carrier design with shallow vee hull and non hull penetrating suspension,capable of carrying 2 pallets or 8 infantrymen in addition to it's 2 man crew,would allow the British Army to reduce it's frontline vehicle fleet to just 3 major types (light,medium and heavy) in the medium term.
Most importantly,cancelling F.R.E.S. Scout/ASCOD would eliminate the threat to the British Army's security of supply caused by a reliance on foreign countries which are often opposed to British military operations.
Armed forces without security of supply cannot serve the interests of the people who pay for them.
There is no reason for the taxpayer to pay for armed forces which can not serve his best interests.
The Americans had the good sense to kill off the Future Combat Systems vehicles.
Perhaps the current financial situation will save the British Army from Future Rapid Effects System.